<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Heyman Law Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bizlawcenter.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bizlawcenter.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Simplified Sales Tax Project? Not so Simple.</title>
		<link>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/18/extending-the-reach-states-seek-to-tax-out-of-state-buyers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/18/extending-the-reach-states-seek-to-tax-out-of-state-buyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Heyman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simplified Sales Tax Project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizlawcenter.com/?p=582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless you&#8217;re a resident of Alaska, Delaware, New Hampshire, Montana or Oregon, when you purchase an item from a local store, you expect to pay state and local sales tax.   Citizens of states that impose sales taxes are required to pay them for every non-exempt purchase regardless of where the seller is located.  Obviously, retailers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/18/extending-the-reach-states-seek-to-tax-out-of-state-buyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Violations: First Google, then Facebook, and now MySpace</title>
		<link>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/16/privacy-violations-first-google-then-facebook-and-now-myspace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/16/privacy-violations-first-google-then-facebook-and-now-myspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Heyman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Privacy Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizlawcenter.com/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After an investigation into the privacy practices of  MySpace, the Federal Trade Commission agreed to settle pending charges that the Social Networking Service misrepresented the procedures it used to protect its users personal information.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/16/privacy-violations-first-google-then-facebook-and-now-myspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Do-Not-Track Legislation Passes its First Hurdle</title>
		<link>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/14/california-do-not-track-legislation-passes-its-first-hurdle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/14/california-do-not-track-legislation-passes-its-first-hurdle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Heyman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Do-Not-Track]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizlawcenter.com/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As in so many other areas, California is playing a leading role in enacting legislation designed to protect California Internet users from unwanted online advertising methods. The California Do-Not Track bill, SB-761, passed a Senate Judiciary Committee vote last week, and now moves on to the Appropriations Committee.  Afterwards (assuming it passes muster in its [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/14/california-do-not-track-legislation-passes-its-first-hurdle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Email Exchanges Can Result in a Contract</title>
		<link>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/10/email-exchanges-can-result-in-a-contract/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/10/email-exchanges-can-result-in-a-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Heyman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizlawcenter.com/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as one party can demonstrate the presence of an offer, acceptance, intent, and consideration, a contract can be formed via e-mail exchange as easily as through more traditional or formal means. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/10/email-exchanges-can-result-in-a-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seven Principles of the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/07/seven-principles-of-the-consumer-privacy-bill-of-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/07/seven-principles-of-the-consumer-privacy-bill-of-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Heyman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPBR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bizlawcenter.com/?p=571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration’s proposal for a Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights (“CPBR”), which was released as part of  its white paper, “Consumer Data Privacy in a Networked World: A Framework for Protecting Privacy and Promoting Innovation in the Global Digital Economy,” is intended to give users more control over how their personal information is used [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bizlawcenter.com/2012/05/07/seven-principles-of-the-consumer-privacy-bill-of-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

